3 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Jens	80a2d1654d	fix(platform): govern geospatial analysis and raster handoffs	2026-08-30 06:00:15 +02:00
JensandClaude Opus 5	ff4a15aa74	let an operator's adjudication reach the score ... The review vocabulary already separates a model error from a reference gap, because the product's position is that official footprints are not automatically perfect ground truth. Those verdicts were only counted. An operator who inspected forty false positives and established that twelve are buildings the reference simply lacks still saw a precision counting all forty against the model — a number they had personally disproved, on the panel where they disproved it. Applying the verdicts gives an adjudicated score reported next to the raw one, so nothing is quietly improved. Not being able to judge is not evidence in the model's favour, so uncertain and obscured verdicts keep counting, as does a decision from a later release that this runtime does not recognise. Because part of the evidence is usually still unreviewed, the honest form is an interval rather than a single corrected number: pessimistic assumes every unreviewed finding is a model error, optimistic assumes none is, and the headline equals the pessimistic reading so a partly reviewed check never presents as a settled one. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-22 20:43:22 +02:00
Codex	d22abe8e7b	feat: add measured detection review loop	2026-07-15 03:00:08 +02:00