hardening: record audit remediation boundaries
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
|
|||||||
|
# GeoIntel hardening — 2026-08-26
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This change set converts the 2026-08-26 repository audit into executable
|
||||||
|
guardrails without widening any data-source or AI accuracy claim.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Implemented controls
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Secure defaults
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Guest access is opt-in instead of enabled by default.
|
||||||
|
- Configured YOLO validation-scope enforcement is opt-out only in
|
||||||
|
non-production research/development contexts.
|
||||||
|
- Production YOLO uses CUDA and an immutable validation-scope manifest; when
|
||||||
|
scope evidence is absent or invalid, inference fails closed rather than being
|
||||||
|
treated as validated.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Repository hygiene
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- `.codex-input/` and `.codex-artifacts/` are forbidden tracked paths.
|
||||||
|
- Transient SQLite WAL/SHM files are forbidden.
|
||||||
|
- A tracked-file size budget prevents large local scratch artifacts from
|
||||||
|
silently returning; governed accuracy evidence and presentation assets have
|
||||||
|
explicit narrow allowlists.
|
||||||
|
- Cross-project DockDeck inputs and generated GeoIntel scratch artifacts are
|
||||||
|
removed from the current repository tree.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Historical Git objects are intentionally not rewritten by this change. Purging
|
||||||
|
old blobs requires a coordinated destructive history rewrite and force-update
|
||||||
|
of every clone, so it is a separate operator decision.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Engineering quality
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Repository architecture budgets turn the largest legacy modules into a
|
||||||
|
ratchet: they may shrink but may not grow.
|
||||||
|
- Critical Python static checks and frontend source-policy linting are release
|
||||||
|
gates alongside the existing full tests, typecheck and build.
|
||||||
|
- The source-policy gate forbids debugger statements, `@ts-ignore`, `eval()` and
|
||||||
|
dynamic `Function` construction without adding an unlocked npm dependency.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
A migration to ESLint 10 remains a dependency upgrade rather than being mixed
|
||||||
|
into this hardening pass. ESLint 9 reached upstream end-of-life in August 2026.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Supply chain
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- External Actions are pinned to full commit SHAs.
|
||||||
|
- External Docker base/runtime images are digest-pinned.
|
||||||
|
- CI verifies those policies so mutable references cannot silently return.
|
||||||
|
- Both GIS and AI release images are built, SBOMed and scanned under the same
|
||||||
|
vulnerability policy.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Deployment gating
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Tower autoredeploy is downstream of the successful `GeoIntel release gates`
|
||||||
|
workflow on `main` and deploys the workflow's exact validated head SHA. A direct
|
||||||
|
push can therefore no longer bypass release validation and immediately roll to
|
||||||
|
production.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Explicit non-claims
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This hardening does **not**:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- make the active building detector nationally validated;
|
||||||
|
- replace the required geographically independent protected test and human
|
||||||
|
review evidence;
|
||||||
|
- convert guest mode into tenant isolation;
|
||||||
|
- convert the PostgreSQL/in-process worker model into a distributed queue;
|
||||||
|
- purge historical Git objects;
|
||||||
|
- alter official source semantics or CRS contracts.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## External repository control
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Gitea branch protection for `main` is still required. The connected workspace
|
||||||
|
can audit protection, create isolated branches, validate pull requests and merge
|
||||||
|
them safely, but it does not expose a write operation for branch-protection
|
||||||
|
rules. Until an administrator enables protection, the downstream validated
|
||||||
|
deploy gate remains the compensating production control.
|
||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user