Files
chimera-gfx-Public/docs/runtime/phase-0.9e-independent-rescue-chain.md
Chimera GFX release export a6037502d7
phase0-ci / build-and-audit (push) Successful in 2m14s
Publish Chimera GFX source
2026-09-03 03:27:14 +02:00

4.3 KiB

Phase 0.9E independent rescue chain

Date: 2026-07-18

Decision: BOOTSTRAP_IMPLEMENTATION_MISSING

Dependency graph

flowchart LR
    A["Operator trigger<br/>exact artifact missing"]
    B["Y2JB/browser exploit host<br/>opaque candidate only"]
    C["Rudimentary port-9020 listener<br/>implementation missing"]
    D["Host sender<br/>README concept only"]
    E["hardened elfldr-ps5.elf<br/>local reference build"]
    F["embedded bootstrap<br/>source design"]
    G["elfldr service :9021<br/>source design"]
    H["controlled Payload Manager<br/>offline reference build"]

    A --> B --> C
    D --> C
    C --> E --> F --> G --> H
Node Environment / side State Start/input/output Dependencies Device file / autoload Recovery role Evidence
operator trigger host/browser unknown unknown exact package unknown begins jailbreak session UNKNOWN
Y2JB/exploit host browser/host unknown opaque backup candidate trigger/package unknown could recreate 9020 state POSSIBLE
rudimentary loader PS5 process/kernel context unknown unknown presumed listener on 9020 exploit unknown candidate rescue executor implementation missing
conceptual sender host temporary host connects and streams an ELF per README working listener no sender-side device path sends elfldr architecture only
hardened elfldr bootstrap PS5 temporary entry, then background service design final ELF embeds bootstrap and service 9020 execution source itself does not install, but performs documented process/kernel changes creates port 9021 exact local source, not deployed-use proof
elfldr service PS5 process background design listens TCP 9021 hardened bootstrap no autoload source path later payload executor exact source, hardware unproven
controlled Manager PS5 process not installed in evidence separate launch via elfldr elfldr 9021 controlled storage if used; no autoload management layer offline reference only

No node before hardened elfldr has a source-bound executable identity.

Required questions

  1. Who listens on 9020? Unknown. The elfldr README calls it a “rudimentary ELF loader”; no implementation is present.
  2. Who starts it? Presumably the exploit chain, but exact trigger and process are unknown.
  3. Before elfldr? Architecturally yes; exact implementation proof is absent.
  4. Available again after reboot? Plausible for a repeatable jailbreak, not proven for the used package.
  5. Requires working elfldr on filesystem? Architecture says no; exact loader proof is absent, so independent_from_elfldr=unproven.
  6. Requires Payload Manager? Architecture says no; exact proof is absent, so independent_from_payload_manager=unproven.
  7. Can it receive a payload directly? The README assumes an elfldr ELF can be sent; limits and exact acceptance are unknown.
  8. Accepted format? The sender streams ELF bytes. Server validation, container rules, and truncation behavior are unknown.
  9. Automatic execution? Required by the described bootstrap, but no server source proves it.
  10. Writes a device file first? Unknown.
  11. Can it execute without live replacement? Plausible, not proven.
  12. Restart after a payload crash? Unknown.
  13. Does reboot remove temporary state? Plausible, not proven.
  14. Depends on autoload? No architectural requirement is documented, but actual configuration is absent.
  15. Works with both later components absent? Conceptual chain says yes; exact implementation is missing.
  16. Rescue without filesystem write? Unknown.
  17. Independent result channel? No exact result/output contract exists.
  18. Hardware-unproven aspects: all process identities, boot persistence, port behavior, parser behavior, mapping/entry, file writes, cleanup, crash/hang response, and reboot recovery.

Independence decision

An architectural diagram alone permits at most PARTIAL_RESCUE_EXECUTOR. Here, the actual executable implementation itself is unavailable, so the more precise required classification is:

BOOTSTRAP_IMPLEMENTATION_MISSING

This does not mean the chain is dependent; it means independence cannot be audited. phase09f_rescue_payload_design_allowed=false.