fix: localize the primary data-quality evidence summary (live-caught on Unraid)

Live validation on the deployed fix branch caught a real bug: every data-quality
issue's top-of-page "Evidence summary" line rendered the raw, always-English legacy
evidence.summary string unconditionally -- in all three languages -- even though the
backend has been emitting structured, localizable evidence.signals for a while
(app/services/data_quality.py already documented this exact intent). The frontend
side of that conversion was never finished.

- DataQualityIssueDetail.tsx now renders evidence.signals through the operator's
  locale as the primary summary; the raw evidence.summary string is only visible
  inside "Technical details" (via the existing EvidenceDisclosure JSON dump).
- The four DQ-DEMO-* seed rows that anchor the guided demo's scripted scenarios now
  carry real, accurate signals computed at seed time (duplicate-customer's similarity
  score is the actual SequenceMatcher ratio on the seeded names, not invented) instead
  of only a legacy English sentence.
- Rows with no structured signals (generic filler seed data) fall back to the raw
  text rather than showing a blank summary; the one known placeholder string gets its
  own localized rendering so it never displays as English filler either.
- New regression test: the vehicle_status_conflict evidence summary must show
  localized text and must never contain the specific raw English sentence that was
  live-visible before this fix, in all 3 languages.

151 backend tests, Ruff, mypy green; full local Playwright suite green (a couple of
sequential-run-only flakes, both confirmed to pass in isolation and unrelated to this
change).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

frontend/src/i18n/locales/fr-BE/quality.json

@@ -101,6 +101,17 @@
         "whyItMatters": "Un statut incorrect peut faire apparaître un véhicule indisponible comme réservable, ou masquer un véhicule disponible de la flotte."
       }
     },
+    "evidence": {
+      "duplicate.exact_email": "Adresse e-mail identique",
+      "duplicate.exact_phone": "Numéro de téléphone identique",
+      "duplicate.same_postal_code": "Même code postal",
+      "duplicateSimilarName": "Nom fortement similaire (score {{score}})",
+      "missingField": "Champ manquant : {{field}}",
+      "overlapReservedBookings": "Réservations qui se chevauchent : {{refs}}",
+      "odometerRegression": "La réservation {{laterRef}} a enregistré {{laterKm}} km, en dessous des {{earlierKm}} km enregistrés par la réservation antérieure {{earlierRef}}.",
+      "upcomingBookingMissingInspection": "La réservation {{bookingRef}} commence bientôt mais l'inspection opérationnelle requise est encore manquante.",
+      "seedPlaceholder": "Donnée de démonstration synthétique sans autre détail."
+    },
     "duplicateCustomer": {
       "heading": "Comparer et fusionner",
       "description": "Choisissez le client de référence et examinez chaque champ divergent.",