DevRunbook-Public/content/playbooks/accessibility-audit/playbook.yaml

apiVersion: devrunbook.io/v1alpha1
kind: Playbook
metadata:
  id: audits.accessibility-audit
  slug: accessibility-audit
  version: 1.0.0
  title: Accessibility Audit
  summary: Audit semantic structure, keyboard use, focus, forms, contrast, motion and assistive-technology behavior for selected
    user flows.
  category: audits
  tags:
  - accessibility
  - wcag
  - frontend
  lifecycle: reviewed
  riskTier: moderate
  authors:
  - name: DevRunbook Core Team
  license: MIT
package:
  files:
  - path: prompt.md
    role: template
    digest: true
    exportByDefault: false
  - path: README.md
    role: documentation
    digest: true
    exportByDefault: false
  - path: CHANGELOG.md
    role: changelog
    digest: true
    exportByDefault: false
  - path: examples/minimal.yaml
    role: example
    digest: true
    exportByDefault: false
  - path: evaluations/static-structure.yaml
    role: evaluation
    digest: true
    exportByDefault: false
spec:
  type: guided
  intent:
    problem: Development work around accessibility audit is often underspecified, inconsistently executed or reported without
      enough evidence.
    outcome: Audit semantic structure, keyboard use, focus, forms, contrast, motion and assistive-technology behavior for
      selected user flows.
    whenToUse:
    - Use this playbook when the repository needs a bounded accessibility audit task with explicit evidence and completion
      criteria.
    - Use it when Codex should follow a repeatable workflow rather than improvise from a one-line request.
    whenNotToUse:
    - Do not use it when the desired outcome or authority boundaries are still materially undecided.
    - Do not use it to access unavailable production credentials, bypass safeguards or claim validation that cannot be performed.
  modes:
  - inspect
  - plan
  defaultMode: inspect
  autonomy:
    min: observe
    max: diagnose
    default: diagnose
  inputs:
  - key: targetStandard
    label: Target standard
    description: Choose the accessibility target against which findings should be assessed.
    type: enum
    required: true
    sensitive: false
    includeInOutput: true
    default: WCAG 2.2 AA
    options:
    - WCAG 2.2 A
    - WCAG 2.2 AA
    - WCAG 2.2 AAA
    - EN 301 549
  - key: criticalFlows
    label: Critical flows
    description: List the highest-value user or system flows that must be covered.
    type: string-list
    required: true
    sensitive: false
    includeInOutput: true
  compatibility:
    repositoryRequired: true
    languages: []
    frameworks: []
    packageManagers: []
    databases: []
    deploymentTypes: []
    requiredProfileCapabilities: []
    incompatibleConditions: []
  guardrails:
  - id: guardrail-1
    severity: blocking
    text: Do not declare conformance from automated scans alone.
  - id: guardrail-2
    severity: blocking
    text: Do not expose private user data in screenshots or reports.
  - id: guardrail-3
    severity: blocking
    text: Separate confirmed failures, tool warnings and manual-review requirements.
  workflow:
  - id: define-target
    title: Define audit target
    instruction: Confirm the selected standard, user flows, supported input methods and representative content.
    required: true
  - id: automated-baseline
    title: Run automated baseline
    instruction: Use available accessibility tooling to identify machine-detectable issues without treating it as complete
      coverage.
    required: true
  - id: keyboard-review
    title: Review keyboard behavior
    instruction: Verify focus order, visible focus, escape behavior, skip paths and keyboard completion of critical flows.
    required: true
  - id: semantics-review
    title: Review semantics
    instruction: Inspect headings, landmarks, labels, errors, live regions, tables and accessible names.
    required: true
  - id: visual-review
    title: Review visual access
    instruction: Check contrast, zoom, reflow, reduced motion, non-color cues and target sizes.
    required: true
  - id: assistive-review
    title: Review assistive behavior
    instruction: Perform available screen-reader or accessibility-tree checks and document untested combinations.
    required: true
  - id: prioritize
    title: Prioritize remediation
    instruction: Map findings to success criteria, user impact and practical repair sequence.
    required: true
  validation:
    commandRoles:
    - dev-start
    - end-to-end-test
    checks:
    - id: check-1
      type: assertion
      description: Findings map to the selected standard and include user impact.
      blocking: true
      evidence: Referenced files, command results or explicit review notes.
    - id: check-2
      type: assertion
      description: Automated, keyboard, semantic and visual evidence are reported separately.
      blocking: true
      evidence: Referenced files, command results or explicit review notes.
    - id: command-dev-start
      type: command
      description: Run the resolved dev-start command when the repository profile provides it and record the result.
      blocking: true
      evidence: Resolved command, exit status and concise result summary.
    - id: command-end-to-end-test
      type: command
      description: Run the resolved end-to-end-test command when the repository profile provides it and record the result.
      blocking: true
      evidence: Resolved command, exit status and concise result summary.
  completion:
    criteria:
    - Issues include reproduction, affected users and remediation guidance.
    - Automated and manual evidence are clearly separated.
    - Validation evidence and unresolved limitations are reported honestly.
  failurePolicy:
    onValidationFailure: Investigate failures caused by the current work, repair them when they remain within scope, rerun
      affected validation and report any genuine blocker without claiming success.
    onAmbiguity: Use repository evidence and existing conventions for minor reversible choices. Preserve current behavior
      and stop before any material irreversible decision that the specification does not resolve.
    onMissingContext: Inspect the repository for missing non-sensitive context. Never invent commands, credentials, production
      behavior or validation results; report what remains unavailable.
    onOutOfScopeCause: Explain the evidenced out-of-scope cause, avoid unrelated changes and provide the smallest safe follow-up
      recommendation.
    onExternalDependencyUnavailable: Use an approved local substitute or fixture only when it preserves the behavior under
      test. Otherwise record the blocked validation and do not claim the external path succeeded.
    onUnableToReproduce: Record attempted reproduction, environment and observed evidence. Do not apply speculative production
      changes; provide the narrowest next diagnostic action.
  reporting:
    sections:
    - id: outcome
      title: Outcome
      required: true
      description: State the delivered result or audit conclusion without overstating evidence.
    - id: evidence
      title: Evidence and scope
      required: true
      description: List inspected or changed areas and the evidence supporting the result.
    - id: validation
      title: Validation
      required: true
      description: Report commands, manual checks and their actual outcomes.
    - id: risks
      title: Risks and limitations
      required: true
      description: State residual risk, inaccessible evidence and untested conditions.
    - id: follow-up
      title: Recommended follow-up
      required: true
      description: List the smallest useful next actions or state None.
  template:
    main: prompt.md
    partials: []
  exports:
    prompt: true
    markdown: true
    runPack: false
    agentsSuggestion: false
quality:
  reviewStatus: editorial-reviewed
  testedStacks: []
  knownLimitations:
  - Repository-specific effectiveness depends on the accuracy of the selected profile and the evidence available to Codex.
  evaluationCaseIds:
  - accessibility-audit.static-structure